Evaluation of Storage Symptoms Improvement and Factors Affecting, After Relief of Obstruction in Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the improvement of storage symptoms in accordance with voiding symptoms and assess the prognostic factors that influence the relief of storage symptoms after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: Between August 2017 and November 2019, 75 patients indicated for TURP were included in the study, we assessed the improvement of storage symptoms and factors that may influence storage symptoms persistence after TURP such as Age, Overactive bladder symptoms (OABS) score (Blaivas 2007) and Urodynamic parameters such as maximum flow rate (Q MAX), maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), bladder contractility index (BCI), phasic and terminal detrusor overactivity (DO). Assessment of patients was done before and 6 months after TURP by international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QLSS), OABSS (Blaivas score 2007), and urodynamic studies. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 67.88±7.82 years. The patients with persistence of storage symptoms were significantly older 70.43±8.32 vs 67.04±7.49 respectively P-value = 0.022, also IPSS score was significantly higher in patients with resolution of symptoms (26.83±3.91 vs 24.35±3.68 P = .017). Terminal D.O and Q max were significantly higher in patients with persistence of storage symptoms (26.3% and 8.1 vs 8.9% and 6 respectively). MCC was significantly higher in a patient with resolution vs persistence of storage symptoms (345.18±90.89 mL vs 242.16±72.73) respectively P = 0.001 There was no significant difference between both groups regarding duration of symptoms, prostate size, prostatic specific antigen (PSA), QOL score, OABS score, and maximum detrusor pressure CONCLUSION: more elderly patients with MCC less than 250 ccs and terminal DO were associated with worse outcomes and persistence of storage symptoms post TURP.

WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical performance and surgical outcomes of the new digital single use flexible ureteroscope (WiScope®) with a reusable digital flexible ureteroscope. PATIENT AND METHODS: Our prospective study includes patients with renal stones less than 2 cm who underwent retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. Patients were randomized into two groups: group A included patients who underwent laser lithotripsy using WiScope® Single use digital flexible ureteroscope and group B included patients who underwent laser lithotripsy using reusable flexible ureteroscope. Image quality, deflection, ease of insertion, maneuverability, and overall performance were assessed using either a visual analog or Likert scale. Operative outcomes and complications were collected and analyzed in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included in our study. There were 121 patients in the WiScope® group and 121 patients in reusable ureteroscope group. The WiScope® had higher maneuverability (9.3 ± 0.7 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001) and less limb fatigue but had lower image quality when compared to reusable digital flexible ureteroscope (7.6 ± 0.9 vs. 9.2 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). There were no differences in operative time, complication rates and rates of relook ureteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The WiScope® single use flexible ureteroscope has comparable outcomes to the reusable flexible ureteroscope with regard to maneuverability, limb fatigue, and deflection. However, it has a lower image quality.

Transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis: Tips and tricks to make it easier.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) for giant hydronephrosis (GH) and compare the outcome data with open nephrectomy (ON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective data of 88 patients (52 males and 36 females) who underwent LN or ON for treatment of GH in the period between October 2015 and December 2019 were investigated. LN was performed in 38 patients, while 50 patients underwent ON. We compared the two groups for success, operative time, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the LN group was 45.8 ± 11.4 years, and it was 44.7 ± 10.8 years in the ON group. The mean operative time in the LN group was statistically significantly longer when compared with the ON group195 ± 18 min versus 127 ± 22 min (p = 0.01).The estimated blood loss was significantly greater in the ON group (p = 0.01). However, no patients required blood transfusions in either group. The visual analog pain (VAP) scores were significantly higher on both day 1 and day 2 in the ON group 3.6 ± 0.9 and 2 ± 0.7 versus 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.4 ± 0.5 in LN group, (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LN for GH is feasible, safe, and efficacious. Compared to open surgery, the laparoscopic approach resulted in significantly shorter hospital stays, decreased morbidity, and quicker recovery. Some tips and tricks could help to do it in an easier way and reduce the operative time.

Comparative Study between Silodosin and Tamsulosin in Expectant Therapy of Distal Ureteral Stones.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of silodosin against tamsulosin as medical expulsion therapeutic agent in stone lower 1/3rd ureter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty patients divided equally into 2 groups I and II received silodosin 8 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg respectively. Patients aged 18 years or older having single unilateral stone 10 mm or less were included in the study. Patients with bilateral or multiple stones, marked hydronephrosis, previous open or endoscopic surgery and having urinary infection were excluded. Patients were followed weekly for 4 weeks by ultrasonography, plain radiography of the urinary tract and CT of the urinary tract when indicated. RESULTS: Silodosin showed better results against tamsulosin as stone expulsion rate in silodosin and tamsulosin groups was 82.4 and 61.5% respectively with significant difference (p = 0.007). Also, the stone expulsion time was significantly lower in silodosin against tamsulosin groups as it was 9.4 ± 3.8 vs. 12.7 ± 5.1 days in group I and II respectively (p = 0.001). The adverse effects were comparable with non-significant more retrograde ejaculation in the silodosin group. CONCLUSION: Silodosin showed better efficacy in the stone expulsion rate and time with comparable safety of both drugs, with nonsignificant more retrograde ejaculation in silodosin.

A Critical Analysis of Stented and Unstented Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty Through a Prospective Randomized Study and Assessment of Factors Influencing the Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, functionally and aesthetically, stented and unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU). In addition, predictors of repair success were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ten children with distal hypospadias were included in this study. The length and width of the urethral plate (UP) and transverse glans diameter (TGD) were measured. Patients were randomized into two groups: stented and unstented TIPU. Postoperative assessment of pain was done using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, and cosmetic outcome was evaluated using hypospadias objective scoring evaluation. Uroflow was assessed at 6 months in toilet-trained boys. Complications were graded by the Clavien classification system. RESULTS: In 93 cases, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability score, hospital stay, and dressing time were in favor of the unstented group, whereas hypospadias objective scoring evaluation score and uroflow parameters were comparable. TGD and UP width varied significantly between successful and failed cases. Cutoff values of 13.5 mm and 8.5 mm for TGD and UP width, respectively, are required for successful outcome. Acute urinary retention was 12.8% after unstented repair. Detrusor spasm was 47.8% after stented and 8.5% after unstented repair. In both groups, urethrocutaneous fistula of 5.4%, glanular dehiscence of 1.1%, and meatal stenosis of 5.4% were found in cases with small TGD and narrow UP. CONCLUSION: Unstented TIPU evades the associated drawbacks of the stent along with lower postoperative pain, hospital stay, and dressing time. Even without a postoperative stent, the complication rate in infants with distal hypospadias is low, and short-term functional and aesthetic outcomes were not compromised.